Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, has appealed against the order
given by a Federal Capital Territory High Court judge, Justice Valentine Ashi,
that security agents, including the police and men of the Department of State
Service, should confiscate his latest autobiography, My Watch.
The judge had given this order after the ex-president went
ahead on Tuesday in Lagos to present the book to the public, in disobedience to
the court’s restraining injunction.
Justice Ashi also gave the former president a 21-day
ultimatum to explain why he should not be punished for flouting the court
order.
However, Obasanjo, in his appeal, argued that he was in no
way “daring the court” as widely reported by some national newspapers,
describing such publication as misleading.
The Chairman, Mobilisation and Organisation Committee, the
Peoples Democratic Party, South West, Mr. Buruji Kashamu, had instituted a
legal action against some sections of the book.
Obasanjo had, through his legal team, led by Gboyega
Oyewole, filed an appeal challenging the confiscation order, citing 10 grounds
to support the appeal and arguing that the trial judge erred in his ruling.
In the appeal with suit no. CV/472/14, filed in a Federal
High Court, Abuja, a copy of which was made available to journalists in
Abeokuta, the former president’s counsel contended that his client was
dissatisfied with the ruling of the High Court and “appealed against the said
ruling upon the ground set forth…”
He said, “The learned trial judge erred in law when he
granted the interlocutory order of injunction, which inter alia restrained the
defendant from the publication of his book “My Watch” or the content of the
letter to the President, which is the subject of the suit before the trial
judge in the said book.
“There was uncontradicted affidavit evidence that the
defendant’s book, “My Watch” had been published and released to the public
before the making of the interlocutory order.
“The plaintiff never alluded to this fact in his affidavit
before the court. It is settled law that an injunction does not lie to restrain
a completed act. His Lordship failed and/or neglected to allude to the
affidavit evidence before making the interlocutory order.
“The learned trial judge erred in law and exercised his
discretion wrongfully in granting the order of interlocutory injunction,
subject of this appeal against the defendant, restraining him from publishing
his book, “My Watch” or publishing his letter subject of the suit in the said
book.”
Meanwhile, one of the aides of Obasanjo at the Olusegun
Obasanjo Presidential Library, Abeokuta, Mr. Vitalise Ortese, on Thursday
exonerated his principal from deliberately flouting a court order.
In a statement he signed, Ortese said since the news of the
said order broke, he (Obasanjo) had been receiving calls from concerned friends
far and near and he was constrained to make this release and present the facts
as they relate to the book and its public presentation.
Ortese said, “Chief Olusegun Obasanjo wishes to state that
the media reports which convey the impression that he intended to ‘dare or
confront a judge or the judiciary’ is highly misleading.
“Far from this; on the contrary, the former president is a
law abiding citizen, who will only pursue his rights within the law and will
not “‘dare” a judge or knowingly flout an order of a court of competent
jurisdiction.
“The former President wishes to make it clear that in the
first instance, no formal order from Justice Ashi was served and received by
either himself or by proxy regarding any injunction restraining the publication
of the book, “My Watch,” which from the records was already in circulation.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Drop your comments