Michael Paulkovich |
Historical
researcher Michael Paulkovich has claimed that Jesus of Nazareth was a
‘mythical character’ and never existed.
The
controversial discovery was apparently made after he found no verifiable
mention of Christ from 126 writers during the ‘time of Jesus’ from the first to
third centuries.
He
says he is a fictional character invented by followers of Christianity to
create a figure to worship.
The
claims were made in an article for Free Inquiry called The Fable of the Christ
and a book called No Meek Messiah.
In
the article and book, Paulkovich says he found an absence of evidence for Jesus
in historical texts.
And
he says this is surprising despite his ‘global miracles and alleged worldwide
fame.’
The
126 texts he studied were all written in the period during or soon after the
supposed existence of Jesus, when Paulkovich says they would surely have heard
of someone as famous as Jesus - but none mention him.
'When
I consider those 126 writers, all of whom should have heard of Jesus but did
not - and Paul and Marcion and Athenagoras and Matthew with a tetralogy of
opposing Christs, the silence from Qumram and Nazareth and Bethlehem,
conflicting Bible stories, and so many other mysteries and omissions - I must
conclude that Christ is a mythical character,’ he writes.
‘"Jesus
of Nazareth" was nothing more than urban (or desert) legend, likely an
agglomeration of several evangelic and deluded rabbis who might have existed.’
Of
the writings he examined, written from the first to third centuries, he found
only one book that contained a mention of Jesus - The Jewish Wars by the Roman
historian Josephus Flavius written in 95 CE, but he claims it is fabricated.
Paulkovich
says the mentions of Jesus were added later by editors, not by Josephus.
Even
in the Bible Paulkovich says Paul, often credited with spreading what would
become Christianity, never refers to Jesus as a real person.
‘Paul
is unaware of the virgin mother, and ignorant of Jesus' nativity, parentage,
life events, ministry, miracles, apostles, betrayal, trial and harrowing
passion,’ he writes.
‘Paul
knows neither where nor when Jesus lived, and considers the crucifixion
metaphorical.’
He
also says that silence from Jesus himself is telling, with no personal accounts
being written.
‘Perhaps
the most bewildering "silent one" is the mythical super-savior
himself, Jesus the Son of God ostensibly sent on a suicide mission to save us
from the childish notion of "Adam's Transgression" as we learn from
Romans,’ he says.
‘The
Jesus character is a phantom of a wisp of a personage who never wrote anything.
So, add one more: 127.’
He
continues: ‘Christian father Marcion of Pontus in 144 CE denied any virgin
birth or childhood for Christ - Jesus' infant circumcision was thus a lie, as
well as the crucifixion!
‘Reading
the works of second century Christian father Athenagoras, one never encounters
the word Jesus (or Ἰησοῦς or Ἰησοῦν, as he would have written) - Athenagoras
was thus unacquainted with the name of his savior it would seem.’
And
he claims even the book of Mark in the Bible, which contains the story of
Christ’s resurrection, was doctored later on.
‘The
original booklet given the name "Mark" ended at 16:8, later forgers
adding the fanciful resurrection tale,’ he says.
‘Millions
should have heard of the Jesus "crucifixion" with its astral
enchantments: zombie armies and meteorological marvels recorded not by any
historian, but only in the dubitable scriptures scribbled decades later by
superstitious yokels.’
Paulkovich’s
views will surely prove very controversial, as most scholars do not support the
theory that Jesus never existed.
Most
agree that he was a Galilean Jew born between 7 to 4 BC and who died in 30 to
36 AD.
It
is also widely agreed that he was baptised by John the Baptist and crucified on
the order of the Roman Prefect Pontius Pilate.
I found Paulkovich’s claims fascinating as a few years ago I personally conducted research on documents written 70 AD to 280 AD and chronicled 237 texts that reference Jesus.
ReplyDeleteThe number refers to the texts themselves and not to the number of times that Jesus is referenced in each text.
Counting each reference would take us well beyond the 237 total.
Furthermore, the number refers to the texts and not to each manuscript behind each text.
Counting each manuscript would also take us well beyond the 237 total.
My evidence is here:
http://www.truefreethinker.com/articles/historical-jesus-two-centuries-worth-citations